+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: “War on Terror” as a Diversionary Strategy: Personifying Minorities as Terrorists in

  1. #1
    Unregistered Guest

    Default “War on Terror” as a Diversionary Strategy: Personifying Minorities as Terrorists in

    Great Job Dr. Kilic Bugra Kanat!

    “War on Terror” as a Diversionary Strategy: Personifying Minorities as Terrorists in the People's Republic of China

    Abstract

    This study investigates the relation between minorities and the state in the context of China and its “war on terror”. The study shows that in some instances states like China utilize diversionary strategies, such as “war on terror”, in order to deflect public attention from recurring domestic troubles, to solve the problem of legitimacy and to rally their citizens around the flag of their regime. These diversionary strategies aim to scapegoat a particular group (in most cases an ethnic or religious minority) for current problems of the country and by “othering” this group, the state tries to achieve an in-group/out-group effect and to unify the people. In fact, by creating a “suspect community”, the Chinese state has aimed to consolidate its own “imagined community”. In this study the case of the Uyghur minority in China and the state's policies toward this ethnic group will be used to demonstrate that the Uyghur minority was selected as the domestic other following September 11, 2001, in order to demonize Uyghur dissent groups in diaspora as well as to unify the Chinese people by using the perception of terrorist threat.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/...04.2012.746179

  2. #2
    Unregistered Guest

    Default IHow to view the full text?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Great Job Dr. Kilic Bugra Kanat!

    “War on Terror” as a Diversionary Strategy: Personifying Minorities as Terrorists in the People's Republic of China

    Abstract

    This study investigates the relation between minorities and the state in the context of China and its “war on terror”. The study shows that in some instances states like China utilize diversionary strategies, such as “war on terror”, in order to deflect public attention from recurring domestic troubles, to solve the problem of legitimacy and to rally their citizens around the flag of their regime. These diversionary strategies aim to scapegoat a particular group (in most cases an ethnic or religious minority) for current problems of the country and by “othering” this group, the state tries to achieve an in-group/out-group effect and to unify the people. In fact, by creating a “suspect community”, the Chinese state has aimed to consolidate its own “imagined community”. In this study the case of the Uyghur minority in China and the state's policies toward this ethnic group will be used to demonstrate that the Uyghur minority was selected as the domestic other following September 11, 2001, in order to demonize Uyghur dissent groups in diaspora as well as to unify the Chinese people by using the perception of terrorist threat.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/...04.2012.746179
    It looks like an interesting aqnalysis. Is there any chance to view the full textr?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •